mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning physics-based reduced-order models for a single-injector combustion process

arXiv 1908.03620 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2019physics.comp-ph cs.LG cs.SYcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a physics-based data-driven method to learn predictive reduced-order models (ROMs) from high-fidelity simulations, and illustrates it in the challenging context of a single-injector combustion process. The method combines the perspectives of model reduction and machine learning. Model reduction brings in the physics of the problem, constraining the ROM predictions to lie on a subspace defined by the governing equations. This is achieved by defining the ROM in proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) coordinates, which embed the rich physics information contained in solution snapshots of a high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. The machine learning perspective brings the flexibility to use transformed physical variables to define the POD basis. This is in contrast to traditional model reduction approaches that are constrained to use the physical variables of the high-fidelity code. Combining the two perspectives, the approach identifies a set of transformed physical variables that expose quadratic structure in the combustion governing equations and learns a quadratic ROM from transformed snapshot data. This learning does not require access to the high-fidelity model implementation. Numerical experiments show that the ROM accurately predicts temperature, pressure, velocity, species concentrations, and the limit-cycle amplitude, with speedups of more than five orders of magnitude over high-fidelity models. Our ROM simulation is shown to be predictive 200% past the training interval. Moreover, ROM-predicted pressure traces accurately match the phase of the pressure signal and yield good approximations of the limit-cycle amplitude.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022gLaSDI: Parametric Physics-informed Greedy Latent Space Dynamics Identificationcited by 30
  2. 2021Reduced operator inference for nonlinear partial differential equationscited by 21
  3. 2021Physics-informed regularization and structure preservation for learning stable reduced models from data with operator inferencecited by 16
  4. 2023Canonical and Noncanonical Hamiltonian Operator Inferencecited by 15
  5. 2022Operator inference with roll outs for learning reduced models from scarce and low-quality datacited by 11
  6. 2021Operator inference of non-Markovian terms for learning reduced models from partially observed state trajectoriescited by 5
  7. 2021Active operator inference for learning low-dimensional dynamical-system models from noisy datacited by 5
  8. 2022Neural modal ordinary differential equations: Integrating physics-based modeling with neural ordinary differential equations for modeling high-dimensional monitored structurescited by 5
  9. 2026OpInf-LLM: Parametric PDE Solving with LLMs via Operator Inferencecited by 4
  10. 2022Context-aware controller inference for stabilizing dynamical systems from scarce datacited by 3
  11. 2026Toward Adaptive Non-Intrusive Reduced-Order Models: Design and Challengescited by 3
  12. 2024Dynamical Mode Recognition of Coupled Flame Oscillators by Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Approachescited by 2
8 more
  1. 2024Distributed computing for physics-based data-driven reduced modeling at scale: Application to a rotating detonation rocket enginecited by 2
  2. 2025Physically consistent predictive reduced-order modeling by enhancing Operator Inference with state constraintscited by 2
  3. 2025Nonlinear energy-preserving model reduction with lifting transformations that quadratize the energycited by 2
  4. 2023Dimensionality Reduction and Dynamical Mode Recognition of Circular Arrays of Flame Oscillators Using Deep Neural Networkcited by 1
  5. 2023A Machine Learning Pressure Emulator for Hydrogen Embrittlementcited by 0
  6. 2024Structure-preserving learning for multi-symplectic PDEscited by 0
  7. 2025An adaptive data sampling strategy for stabilizing dynamical systems via controller inferencecited by 0
  8. 2026In-context learning from self-generated trajectories for adaptive model reductioncited by 0