mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Single Point Transductive Prediction

arXiv 1908.02341 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2019stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard methods in supervised learning separate training and prediction: the model is fit independently of any test points it may encounter. However, can knowledge of the next test point xstar be exploited to improve prediction accuracy? We address this question in the context of linear prediction, showing how techniques from semi-parametric inference can be used transductively to combat regularization bias. We first lower bound the xstar prediction error of ridge regression and the Lasso, showing that they must incur significant bias in certain test directions. We then provide non-asymptotic upper bounds on the xstar prediction error of two transductive prediction rules. We conclude by showing the efficacy of our methods on both synthetic and real data, highlighting the improvements single point transductive prediction can provide in settings with distribution shift.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.