A systematic review of fuzzing based on machine learning techniques
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Security vulnerabilities play a vital role in network security system. Fuzzing technology is widely used as a vulnerability discovery technology to reduce damage in advance. However, traditional fuzzing techniques have many challenges, such as how to mutate input seed files, how to increase code coverage, and how to effectively bypass verification. Machine learning technology has been introduced as a new method into fuzzing test to alleviate these challenges. This paper reviews the research progress of using machine learning technology for fuzzing test in recent years, analyzes how machine learning improve the fuzz process and results, and sheds light on future work in fuzzing. Firstly, this paper discusses the reasons why machine learning techniques can be used for fuzzing scenarios and identifies six different stages in which machine learning have been used. Then this paper systematically study the machine learning based fuzzing models from selection of machine learning algorithm, pre-processing methods, datasets, evaluation metrics, and hyperparameters setting. Next, this paper assesses the performance of the machine learning models based on the frequently used evaluation metrics. The results of the evaluation prove that machine learning technology has an acceptable capability of categorize predictive for fuzzing. Finally, the comparison on capability of discovering vulnerabilities between traditional fuzzing tools and machine learning based fuzzing tools is analyzed. The results depict that the introduction of machine learning technology can improve the performance of fuzzing. However, there are still some limitations, such as unbalanced training samples and difficult to extract the characteristics related to vulnerabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021The Threat of Offensive AI to Organizationscited by 37
- 2021Literature review on vulnerability detection using NLP technologycited by 2
- 2025SeedAIchemy: LLM-Driven Seed Corpus Generation for Fuzzingcited by 1
- 2026SEVRA-BENCH: Social Engineering of Vulnerabilities in Review Agentscited by 1
- 2022DeepRNG: Towards Deep Reinforcement Learning-Assisted Generative Testing of Softwarecited by 0
- 2023Revisiting Neural Program Smoothing for Fuzzingcited by 0
- 2024Implementation and Evaluation of a Gradient Descent-Trained Defensible Blackboard Architecture Systemcited by 0
- 2025Clutch Control: An Attention-based Combinatorial Bandit for Efficient Mutation in JavaScript Engine Fuzzingcited by 0
- 2026SEVRA-BENCH: Social Engineering of Vulnerabilities in Review Agents11 Jun 2026
- 2025SeedAIchemy: LLM-Driven Seed Corpus Generation for Fuzzing16 Nov 2025
- 2025Clutch Control: An Attention-based Combinatorial Bandit for Efficient Mutation in JavaScript Engine Fuzzing14 Oct 2025
- 2024Implementation and Evaluation of a Gradient Descent-Trained Defensible Blackboard Architecture System17 Apr 2024
- 2023Revisiting Neural Program Smoothing for Fuzzing28 Sep 2023
- 2022DeepRNG: Towards Deep Reinforcement Learning-Assisted Generative Testing of Software29 Jan 2022
- 2021The Threat of Offensive AI to Organizations30 Jun 2021
- 2021Literature review on vulnerability detection using NLP technology23 Apr 2021