mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

No More Chasing Waterfalls: A Measurement Study of the Header Bidding Ad-Ecosystem

arXiv 1907.12649 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2019cs.CY cs.NIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, Header Bidding (HB) has gained popularity among web publishers, challenging the status quo in the ad ecosystem. Contrary to the traditional waterfall standard, HB aims to give back to publishers control of their ad inventory, increase transparency, fairness and competition among advertisers, resulting in higher ad-slot prices. Although promising, little is known about how this ad protocol works: What are HB's possible implementations, who are the major players, and what is its network and UX overhead? To address these questions, we design and implement HBDetector: a novel methodology to detect HB auctions on a website at real time. By crawling 35,000 top Alexa websites, we collect and analyze a dataset of 800k auctions. We find that: (i) 14.28% of top websites utilize HB. (ii) Publishers prefer to collaborate with a few Demand Partners who also dominate the waterfall market. (iii) HB latency can be significantly higher (up to 3x in median case) than waterfall.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.