mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are Odds Really Odd? Bypassing Statistical Detection of Adversarial Examples

arXiv 1907.12138 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2019cs.LG cs.CR stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning classifiers are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. A recent paper presented at ICML 2019 proposed a statistical test detection method based on the observation that logits of noisy adversarial examples are biased toward the true class. The method is evaluated on CIFAR-10 dataset and is shown to achieve 99% true positive rate (TPR) at only 1% false positive rate (FPR). In this paper, we first develop a classifier-based adaptation of the statistical test method and show that it improves the detection performance. We then propose Logit Mimicry Attack method to generate adversarial examples such that their logits mimic those of benign images. We show that our attack bypasses both statistical test and classifier-based methods, reducing their TPR to less than 2:2% and 1:6%, respectively, even at 5% FPR. We finally show that a classifier-based detector that is trained with logits of mimicry adversarial examples can be evaded by an adaptive attacker that specifically targets the detector. Furthermore, even a detector that is iteratively trained to defend against adaptive attacker cannot be made robust, indicating that statistics of logits cannot be used to detect adversarial examples.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.