mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Adversarial Robustness: The Trade-off between Minimum and Average Margin

arXiv 1907.11780 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep models, while being extremely versatile and accurate, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks: slight perturbations that are imperceptible to humans can completely flip the prediction of deep models. Many attack and defense mechanisms have been proposed, although a satisfying solution still largely remains elusive. In this work, we give strong evidence that during training, deep models maximize the minimum margin in order to achieve high accuracy, but at the same time decrease the average margin hence hurting robustness. Our empirical results highlight an intrinsic trade-off between accuracy and robustness for current deep model training. To further address this issue, we propose a new regularizer to explicitly promote average margin, and we verify through extensive experiments that it does lead to better robustness. Our regularized objective remains Fisher-consistent, hence asymptotically can still recover the Bayes optimal classifier.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

5 papers.