mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Explicit Negation in Answer Set Programming

arXiv 1907.11467 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2019cs.LO cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A common feature in Answer Set Programming is the use of a second negation, stronger than default negation and sometimes called explicit, strong or classical negation. This explicit negation is normally used in front of atoms, rather than allowing its use as a regular operator. In this paper we consider the arbitrary combination of explicit negation with nested expressions, as those defined by Lifschitz, Tang and Turner. We extend the concept of reduct for this new syntax and then prove that it can be captured by an extension of Equilibrium Logic with this second negation. We study some properties of this variant and compare to the already known combination of Equilibrium Logic with Nelson's strong negation. Under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.

2 papers.