Greedy Optimized Multileaving for Personalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalization plays an important role in many services. To evaluate personalized rankings, online evaluation, such as A/B testing, is widely used today. Recently, multileaving has been found to be an efficient method for evaluating rankings in information retrieval fields. This paper describes the first attempt to optimize the multileaving method for personalization settings. We clarify the challenges of applying this method to personalized rankings. Then, to solve these challenges, we propose greedy optimized multileaving (GOM) with a new credit feedback function. The empirical results showed that GOM was stable for increasing ranking lengths and the number of rankers. We implemented GOM on our actual news recommender systems, and compared its online performance. The results showed that GOM evaluated the personalized rankings precisely, with significantly smaller sample sizes (< 1/10) than A/B testing.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.
2 papers.
- 2022Dueling Bandits: From Two-dueling to Multi-dueling16 Nov 2022
- 2021Online Evaluation Methods for the Causal Effect of Recommendations14 Jul 2021