Pathways to Good Healthcare Services and Patient Satisfaction: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spending by the UK's National Health Service (NHS) on independent healthcare treatment has been increased in recent years and is predicted to sustain its upward trend with the forecast of population growth. Some have viewed this increase as an attempt not to expand the patients' choices but to privatize public healthcare. This debate poses a social dilemma whether the NHS should stop cooperating with Private providers. This paper contributes to healthcare economic modelling by investigating the evolution of cooperation among three proposed populations: Public Healthcare Providers, Private Healthcare Providers and Patients. The Patient population is included as a main player in the decision-making process by expanding patient's choices of treatment. We develop a generic basic model that measures the cost of healthcare provision based on given parameters, such as NHS and private healthcare providers' cost of investments in both sectors, cost of treatments and gained benefits. A patient's costly punishment is introduced as a mechanism to enhance cooperation among the three populations. Our findings show that cooperation can be improved with the introduction of punishment (patient's punishment) against defecting providers. Although punishment increases cooperation, it is very costly considering the small improvement in cooperation in comparison to the basic model.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysiscited by 11
- 2025Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agentscited by 11
- 2024Trust AI Regulation? Discerning users are vital to build trust and effective AI regulationcited by 9
- 2026Trust or Check? Understanding the (Evolutionary) Dynamics of User Trust in AI Systemscited by 1
- 2026Trust or Check? Understanding the (Evolutionary) Dynamics of User Trust in AI Systems25 Mar 2026
- 2025Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents11 Apr 2025
- 2025Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis12 Mar 2025
- 2024Trust AI Regulation? Discerning users are vital to build trust and effective AI regulation14 Mar 2024