Optimal Space-Depth Trade-Off of CNOT Circuits in Quantum Logic Synthesis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decoherence -- in the current physical implementations of quantum computers -- makes depth reduction a vital task in quantum-circuit design. Moore and Nilsson (SIAM Journal of Computing, 2001) demonstrated that additional qubits -- known as ancillae -- can be used to provide an extended space to parallelize quantum circuits. Specifically, they proved that, with O(n2) ancillae, any n-qubit CNOT circuit can be transformed into an equivalent one of O(log n) depth. However, the near-term quantum technologies can only support a limited amount of qubits, making space-depth trade-off a fundamental research subject for quantum-circuit synthesis. In this work, we establish an asymptotically optimal space-depth trade-off for CNOT circuits. We prove that any n-qubit CNOT circuit can be parallelized to Oleft(maxleftlog n, fracn2(n+m)log (n+m)rightright) depth with m ancillae. This bound is tight even if the task is expanded from exact synthesis to the approximation of CNOT circuits with arbitrary two-qubit quantum gates. Our result can be extended to stabilizer circuits via the reduction by Aaronson and Gottesman (Physical Review A, 2004). Furthermore, we provide hardness evidence for optimizing CNOT circuits in terms of size or depth. Our result has improved upon two previous papers that motivated our work. Moore-Nilsson's construction (aforementioned) for O(log n)-depth CNOT circuit synthesis: We have reduced their need for ancillae by a factor of log2 n by showing that m= O(n2/log2 n) additional qubits -- which is asymptotically optimal -- suffice to build equivalent O(log n)-depth O(n2/log n)-size CNOT circuits. Patel-Markov-Hayes's construction (Quantum Information & Computation 2008) for m = 0: We have reduced their depth by a factor of n and achieved the asymptotically optimal bound of O(n/log n).
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Near-Term Quantum Computing Techniques: Variational Quantum Algorithms, Error Mitigation, Circuit Compilation, Benchmarking and Classical Simulationcited by 13
- 2024Quantum Circuit Synthesis and Compilation Optimization: Overview and Prospectscited by 8
- 2024Optimal Layout-Aware CNOT Circuit Synthesis with Qubit Permutationcited by 4
- 2025CNOT-Optimal Clifford Synthesis as SATcited by 3
- 2025Quantum State Preparation with the QNN-based SRBB Algorithmcited by 2
- 2026AlphaCNOT: Learning CNOT Minimization with Model-Based Planningcited by 2
- 2026AlphaCNOT: Learning CNOT Minimization with Model-Based Planning15 Apr 2026
- 2025CNOT-Optimal Clifford Synthesis as SAT1 Apr 2025
- 2025Quantum State Preparation with the QNN-based SRBB Algorithm17 Mar 2025
- 2024Optimal Layout-Aware CNOT Circuit Synthesis with Qubit Permutation8 Aug 2024
- 2024Quantum Circuit Synthesis and Compilation Optimization: Overview and Prospects30 Jun 2024
- 2022Near-Term Quantum Computing Techniques: Variational Quantum Algorithms, Error Mitigation, Circuit Compilation, Benchmarking and Classical Simulation16 Nov 2022