Tails of Lipschitz Triangular Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the ability of popular flow based methods to capture tail-properties of a target density by studying the increasing triangular maps used in these flow methods acting on a tractable source density. We show that the density quantile functions of the source and target density provide a precise characterization of the slope of transformation required to capture tails in a target density. We further show that any Lipschitz-continuous transport map acting on a source density will result in a density with similar tail properties as the source, highlighting the trade-off between a complex source density and a sufficiently expressive transformation to capture desirable properties of a target density. Subsequently, we illustrate that flow models like Real-NVP, MAF, and Glow as implemented originally lack the ability to capture a distribution with non-Gaussian tails. We circumvent this problem by proposing tail-adaptive flows consisting of a source distribution that can be learned simultaneously with the triangular map to capture tail-properties of a target density. We perform several synthetic and real-world experiments to compliment our theoretical findings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Heavy-Tailed Diffusion Modelscited by 40
- 2021Convolutional Normalizing Flows for Deep Gaussian Processescited by 2
- 2024Heavy-Tailed Diffusion Models18 Oct 2024
- 2021Convolutional Normalizing Flows for Deep Gaussian Processes17 Apr 2021