Conditional Segmentation in Lieu of Image Registration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Classical pairwise image registration methods search for a spatial transformation that optimises a numerical measure that indicates how well a pair of moving and fixed images are aligned. Current learning-based registration methods have adopted the same paradigm and typically predict, for any new input image pair, dense correspondences in the form of a dense displacement field or parameters of a spatial transformation model. However, in many applications of registration, the spatial transformation itself is only required to propagate points or regions of interest (ROIs). In such cases, detailed pixel- or voxel-level correspondence within or outside of these ROIs often have little clinical value. In this paper, we propose an alternative paradigm in which the location of corresponding image-specific ROIs, defined in one image, within another image is learnt. This results in replacing image registration by a conditional segmentation algorithm, which can build on typical image segmentation networks and their widely-adopted training strategies. Using the registration of 3D MRI and ultrasound images of the prostate as an example to demonstrate this new approach, we report a median target registration error (TRE) of 2.1 mm between the ground-truth ROIs defined on intraoperative ultrasound images and those propagated from the preoperative MR images. Significantly lower (>34%) TREs were obtained using the proposed conditional segmentation compared with those obtained from a previously-proposed spatial-transformation-predicting registration network trained with the same multiple ROI labels for individual image pairs. We conclude this work by using a quantitative bias-variance analysis to provide one explanation of the observed improvement in registration accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021Enhancing Medical Image Registration via Appearance Adjustment Networkscited by 12
- 2021Semantic similarity metrics for learned image registrationcited by 9
- 2024One registration is worth two segmentationscited by 6
- 2024A Narrative Review of Image Processing Techniques Related to Prostate Ultrasoundcited by 3
- 2022Deep Compatible Learning for Partially-Supervised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2
- 2024SAMReg: SAM-enabled Image Registration with ROI-based Correspondencecited by 2
- 2025Register Anything: Estimating "Corresponding Prompts" for Segment Anything Modelcited by 0
- 2025Register Anything: Estimating "Corresponding Prompts" for Segment Anything Model3 Aug 2025
- 2024SAMReg: SAM-enabled Image Registration with ROI-based Correspondence17 Oct 2024
- 2024A Narrative Review of Image Processing Techniques Related to Prostate Ultrasound30 Jun 2024
- 2024One registration is worth two segmentations17 May 2024
- 2022Deep Compatible Learning for Partially-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation18 Jun 2022
- 2021Semantic similarity metrics for learned image registration20 Apr 2021
- 2021Enhancing Medical Image Registration via Appearance Adjustment Networks9 Mar 2021