The dual-process approach to human sociality: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of internalized heuristics for self-preservation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Which social decisions are influenced by intuitive processes? Which by deliberative processes? The dual-process approach to human sociality has emerged in the last decades as a vibrant and exciting area of research. Yet, a perspective that integrates empirical and theoretical work is lacking. This review and meta-analysis synthesizes the existing literature on the cognitive basis of cooperation, altruism, truth-telling, positive and negative reciprocity, and deontology, and develops a framework that organizes the experimental regularities. The meta-analytic results suggest that intuition favours a set of heuristics that are related to the instinct for self-preservation: people avoid being harmed, avoid harming others (especially when there is a risk of harm to themselves), and are averse to disadvantageous inequalities. Finally, this paper highlights some key research questions to further advance our understanding of the cognitive foundations of human sociality.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligencecited by 11
- 2024Language-based game theory in the age of artificial intelligencecited by 9
- 2024Surprising gender biases in GPTcited by 7
- 2025Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence22 Dec 2025
- 2024Surprising gender biases in GPT8 Jul 2024
- 2024Language-based game theory in the age of artificial intelligence13 Mar 2024