Effectiveness of Distillation Attack and Countermeasure on Neural Network Watermarking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rise of machine learning as a service and model sharing platforms has raised the need of traitor-tracing the models and proof of authorship. Watermarking technique is the main component of existing methods for protecting copyright of models. In this paper, we show that distillation, a widely used transformation technique, is a quite effective attack to remove watermark embedded by existing algorithms. The fragility is due to the fact that distillation does not retain the watermark embedded in the model that is redundant and independent to the main learning task. We design ingrain in response to the destructive distillation. It regularizes a neural network with an ingrainer model, which contains the watermark, and forces the model to also represent the knowledge of the ingrainer. Our extensive evaluations show that ingrain is more robust to distillation attack and its robustness against other widely used transformation techniques is comparable to existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 2.
11 papers.
- 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 115
- 2023Rethinking White-Box Watermarks on Deep Learning Models under Neural Structural Obfuscationcited by 20
- 2023Deep Intellectual Property Protection: A Surveycited by 16
- 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attackscited by 11
- 2021Detect and remove watermark in deep neural networks via generative adversarial networkscited by 5
- 2021HufuNet: Embedding the Left Piece as Watermark and Keeping the Right Piece for Ownership Verification in Deep Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2022TATTOOED: A Robust Deep Neural Network Watermarking Scheme based on Spread-Spectrum Channel Codingcited by 3
- 2023Neural Dehydration: Effective Erasure of Black-box Watermarks from DNNs with Limited Datacited by 2
- 2024Revisiting Black-Box Model Ownership Verification through Information Theorycited by 2
- 2023VeriDIP: Verifying Ownership of Deep Neural Networks through Privacy Leakage Fingerprintscited by 0
- 2024Watermarking Recommender Systemscited by 0
- 2024Revisiting Black-Box Model Ownership Verification through Information Theory10 Sep 2024
- 2024Watermarking Recommender Systems17 Jul 2024
- 2023VeriDIP: Verifying Ownership of Deep Neural Networks through Privacy Leakage Fingerprints7 Sep 2023
- 2023Neural Dehydration: Effective Erasure of Black-box Watermarks from DNNs with Limited Data7 Sep 2023
- 2023Deep Intellectual Property Protection: A Survey28 Apr 2023
- 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attacks22 Apr 2023
- 2023Rethinking White-Box Watermarks on Deep Learning Models under Neural Structural Obfuscation17 Mar 2023
- 2022TATTOOED: A Robust Deep Neural Network Watermarking Scheme based on Spread-Spectrum Channel Coding12 Feb 2022
- 2021Detect and remove watermark in deep neural networks via generative adversarial networks15 Jun 2021
- 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learning21 Apr 2021
- 2021HufuNet: Embedding the Left Piece as Watermark and Keeping the Right Piece for Ownership Verification in Deep Neural Networks25 Mar 2021