E3: Entailment-driven Extracting and Editing for Conversational Machine Reading
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational machine reading systems help users answer high-level questions (e.g. determine if they qualify for particular government benefits) when they do not know the exact rules by which the determination is made(e.g. whether they need certain income levels or veteran status). The key challenge is that these rules are only provided in the form of a procedural text (e.g. guidelines from government website) which the system must read to figure out what to ask the user. We present a new conversational machine reading model that jointly extracts a set of decision rules from the procedural text while reasoning about which are entailed by the conversational history and which still need to be edited to create questions for the user. On the recently introduced ShARC conversational machine reading dataset, our Entailment-driven Extract and Edit network (E3) achieves a new state-of-the-art, outperforming existing systems as well as a new BERT-based baseline. In addition, by explicitly highlighting which information still needs to be gathered, E3 provides a more explainable alternative to prior work. We release source code for our models and experiments at https://github.com/vzhong/e3.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 3.
12 papers.
- 2023Natural Language Reasoning, A Surveycited by 61
- 2021Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Surveycited by 12
- 2021Open-Retrieval Conversational Machine Readingcited by 11
- 2023Towards Asking Clarification Questions for Information Seeking on Task-Oriented Dialoguescited by 7
- 2021Smoothing Dialogue States for Open Conversational Machine Readingcited by 6
- 2022Reasoning over Logically Interacted Conditions for Question Answeringcited by 3
- 2022ET5: A Novel End-to-end Framework for Conversational Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 2
- 2022Towards End-to-End Open Conversational Machine Readingcited by 2
- 2023Explicit Alignment and Many-to-many Entailment Based Reasoning for Conversational Machine Readingcited by 1
- 2021Unsupervised Technique To Conversational Machine Readingcited by 0
- 2021Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Surveycited by 0
- 2022Bridging The Gap: Entailment Fused-T5 for Open-retrieval Conversational Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 0
- 2023Explicit Alignment and Many-to-many Entailment Based Reasoning for Conversational Machine Reading20 Oct 2023
- 2023Towards Asking Clarification Questions for Information Seeking on Task-Oriented Dialogues23 May 2023
- 2023Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey26 Mar 2023
- 2022Bridging The Gap: Entailment Fused-T5 for Open-retrieval Conversational Machine Reading Comprehension19 Dec 2022
- 2022Towards End-to-End Open Conversational Machine Reading13 Oct 2022
- 2022ET5: A Novel End-to-end Framework for Conversational Machine Reading Comprehension23 Sep 2022
- 2022Reasoning over Logically Interacted Conditions for Question Answering25 May 2022
- 2021Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Survey11 Oct 2021
- 2021Smoothing Dialogue States for Open Conversational Machine Reading28 Aug 2021
- 2021Unsupervised Technique To Conversational Machine Reading29 Jun 2021
- 2021Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Survey4 Mar 2021
- 2021Open-Retrieval Conversational Machine Reading17 Feb 2021