Characterizing the implicit bias via a primal-dual analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper shows that the implicit bias of gradient descent on linearly separable data is exactly characterized by the optimal solution of a dual optimization problem given by a smoothed margin, even for general losses. This is in contrast to prior results, which are often tailored to exponentially-tailed losses. For the exponential loss specifically, with n training examples and t gradient descent steps, our dual analysis further allows us to prove an O(ln(n)/ln(t)) convergence rate to the ℓ2 maximum margin direction, when a constant step size is used. This rate is tight in both n and t, which has not been presented by prior work. On the other hand, with a properly chosen but aggressive step size schedule, we prove O(1/t) rates for both ℓ2 margin maximization and implicit bias, whereas prior work (including all first-order methods for the general hard-margin linear SVM problem) proved widetildeO(1/√t) margin rates, or O(1/t) margin rates to a suboptimal margin, with an implied (slower) bias rate. Our key observations include that gradient descent on the primal variable naturally induces a mirror descent update on the dual variable, and that the dual objective in this setting is smooth enough to give a faster rate.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Loss: Non-Monotonicity of the Loss Improves Optimization Efficiencycited by 34
- 2022Stability vs Implicit Bias of Gradient Methods on Separable Data and Beyondcited by 29
- 2021Understanding Deflation Process in Over-parametrized Tensor Decompositioncited by 20
- 2023Tight Risk Bounds for Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 7
- 2025Multiclass Loss Geometry Matters for Generalization of Gradient Descent in Separable Classificationcited by 1
- 2025Multiclass Loss Geometry Matters for Generalization of Gradient Descent in Separable Classification28 May 2025
- 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Loss: Non-Monotonicity of the Loss Improves Optimization Efficiency24 Feb 2024
- 2023Tight Risk Bounds for Gradient Descent on Separable Data2 Mar 2023
- 2022Stability vs Implicit Bias of Gradient Methods on Separable Data and Beyond27 Feb 2022
- 2021Understanding Deflation Process in Over-parametrized Tensor Decomposition11 Jun 2021