Efficient non-conjugate Gaussian process factor models for spike count data using polynomial approximations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gaussian Process Factor Analysis (GPFA) has been broadly applied to the problem of identifying smooth, low-dimensional temporal structure underlying large-scale neural recordings. However, spike trains are non-Gaussian, which motivates combining GPFA with discrete observation models for binned spike count data. The drawback to this approach is that GPFA priors are not conjugate to count model likelihoods, which makes inference challenging. Here we address this obstacle by introducing a fast, approximate inference method for non-conjugate GPFA models. Our approach uses orthogonal second-order polynomials to approximate the nonlinear terms in the non-conjugate log-likelihood, resulting in a method we refer to as textitpolynomial approximate log-likelihood (PAL) estimators. This approximation allows for accurate closed-form evaluation of marginal likelihoods and fast numerical optimization for parameters and hyperparameters. We derive PAL estimators for GPFA models with binomial, Poisson, and negative binomial observations and find the PAL estimation is highly accurate, and achieves faster convergence times compared to existing state-of-the-art inference methods. We also find that PAL hyperparameters can provide sensible initialization for black box variational inference (BBVI), which improves BBVI accuracy. We demonstrate that PAL estimators achieve fast and accurate extraction of latent structure from multi-neuron spike train data.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021Neural Latents Benchmark '21: Evaluating latent variable models of neural population activitycited by 57
- 2023Multi-modal Gaussian Process Variational Autoencoders for Neural and Behavioral Datacited by 9
- 2021Nonnegative spatial factorizationcited by 2
- 2022Structured Recognition for Generative Models with Explaining Awaycited by 1
- 2024Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentationcited by 1
- 2024Learning Coupled Subspaces for Multi-Condition Spike Datacited by 0
- 2025Scalable inference of functional neural connectivity at submillisecond timescalescited by 0
- 2026A New Family of Poisson Non-negative Matrix Factorization Methods Using the Shifted Log Linkcited by 0
- 2026A New Family of Poisson Non-negative Matrix Factorization Methods Using the Shifted Log Link9 Jan 2026
- 2025Scalable inference of functional neural connectivity at submillisecond timescales23 Oct 2025
- 2024Learning Coupled Subspaces for Multi-Condition Spike Data24 Oct 2024
- 2024Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentation19 May 2024
- 2023Multi-modal Gaussian Process Variational Autoencoders for Neural and Behavioral Data4 Oct 2023
- 2022Structured Recognition for Generative Models with Explaining Away12 Sep 2022
- 2021Nonnegative spatial factorization12 Oct 2021
- 2021Neural Latents Benchmark '21: Evaluating latent variable models of neural population activity9 Sep 2021