Planning With Uncertain Specifications (PUnS)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward engineering is crucial to high performance in reinforcement learning systems. Prior research into reward design has largely focused on Markovian functions representing the reward. While there has been research into expressing non-Markov rewards as linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas, this has focused on task specifications directly defined by the user. However, in many real-world applications, task specifications are ambiguous, and can only be expressed as a belief over LTL formulas. In this paper, we introduce planning with uncertain specifications (PUnS), a novel formulation that addresses the challenge posed by non-Markovian specifications expressed as beliefs over LTL formulas. We present four criteria that capture the semantics of satisfying a belief over specifications for different applications, and analyze the qualitative implications of these criteria within a synthetic domain. We demonstrate the existence of an equivalent Markov decision process (MDP) for any instance of PUnS. Finally, we demonstrate our approach on the real-world task of setting a dinner table automatically with a robot that inferred task specifications from human demonstrations.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021LTL2Action: Generalizing LTL Instructions for Multi-Task RLcited by 72
- 2023Plug in the Safety Chip: Enforcing Constraints for LLM-driven Robot Agentscited by 67
- 2023Grounding Complex Natural Language Commands for Temporal Tasks in Unseen Environmentscited by 52
- 2025Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robotscited by 30
- 2024Pragmatic Instruction Following and Goal Assistance via Cooperative Language-Guided Inverse Planningcited by 28
- 2021The Logical Options Frameworkcited by 24
- 2023NOPA: Neurally-guided Online Probabilistic Assistance for Building Socially Intelligent Home Assistantscited by 23
- 2024SELP: Generating Safe and Efficient Task Plans for Robot Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2024Reward Machines for Deep RL in Noisy and Uncertain Environmentscited by 11
- 2022Noisy Symbolic Abstractions for Deep RL: A case study with Reward Machinescited by 10
- 2021Decentralized Graph-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Using Reward Machinescited by 6
- 2025Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robots10 Mar 2025
- 2024SELP: Generating Safe and Efficient Task Plans for Robot Agents with Large Language Models28 Sep 2024
- 2024Reward Machines for Deep RL in Noisy and Uncertain Environments31 May 2024
- 2024Pragmatic Instruction Following and Goal Assistance via Cooperative Language-Guided Inverse Planning27 Feb 2024
- 2023Plug in the Safety Chip: Enforcing Constraints for LLM-driven Robot Agents18 Sep 2023
- 2023Grounding Complex Natural Language Commands for Temporal Tasks in Unseen Environments22 Feb 2023
- 2023NOPA: Neurally-guided Online Probabilistic Assistance for Building Socially Intelligent Home Assistants12 Jan 2023
- 2022Noisy Symbolic Abstractions for Deep RL: A case study with Reward Machines20 Nov 2022
- 2021Decentralized Graph-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Using Reward Machines30 Sep 2021
- 2021The Logical Options Framework24 Feb 2021
- 2021LTL2Action: Generalizing LTL Instructions for Multi-Task RL13 Feb 2021