Enhancing Gradient-based Attacks with Symbolic Intervals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent breakthroughs in defenses against adversarial examples, like adversarial training, make the neural networks robust against various classes of attackers (e.g., first-order gradient-based attacks). However, it is an open question whether the adversarially trained networks are truly robust under unknown attacks. In this paper, we present interval attacks, a new technique to find adversarial examples to evaluate the robustness of neural networks. Interval attacks leverage symbolic interval propagation, a bound propagation technique that can exploit a broader view around the current input to locate promising areas containing adversarial instances, which in turn can be searched with existing gradient-guided attacks. We can obtain such a broader view using sound bound propagation methods to track and over-approximate the errors of the network within given input ranges. Our results show that, on state-of-the-art adversarially trained networks, interval attack can find on average 47% relatively more violations than the state-of-the-art gradient-guided PGD attack.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Robust Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 2
- 2022Robust Universal Adversarial Perturbations22 Jun 2022