Finding Syntactic Representations in Neural Stacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural network architectures have been augmented with differentiable stacks in order to introduce a bias toward learning hierarchy-sensitive regularities. It has, however, proven difficult to assess the degree to which such a bias is effective, as the operation of the differentiable stack is not always interpretable. In this paper, we attempt to detect the presence of latent representations of hierarchical structure through an exploration of the unsupervised learning of constituency structure. Using a technique due to Shen et al. (2018a,b), we extract syntactic trees from the pushing behavior of stack RNNs trained on language modeling and classification objectives. We find that our models produce parses that reflect natural language syntactic constituencies, demonstrating that stack RNNs do indeed infer linguistically relevant hierarchical structure.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4.
4 papers.
- 2021Transformers Generalize Linearlycited by 19
- 2021Learning Hierarchical Structures with Differentiable Nondeterministic Stackscited by 16
- 2021Formal Language Theory Meets Modern NLPcited by 9
- 2021Recoding latent sentence representations -- Dynamic gradient-based activation modification in RNNscited by 0
- 2021Transformers Generalize Linearly24 Sep 2021
- 2021Learning Hierarchical Structures with Differentiable Nondeterministic Stacks5 Sep 2021
- 2021Formal Language Theory Meets Modern NLP19 Feb 2021
- 2021Recoding latent sentence representations -- Dynamic gradient-based activation modification in RNNs3 Jan 2021