Relational Word Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While word embeddings have been shown to implicitly encode various forms of attributional knowledge, the extent to which they capture relational information is far more limited. In previous work, this limitation has been addressed by incorporating relational knowledge from external knowledge bases when learning the word embedding. Such strategies may not be optimal, however, as they are limited by the coverage of available resources and conflate similarity with other forms of relatedness. As an alternative, in this paper we propose to encode relational knowledge in a separate word embedding, which is aimed to be complementary to a given standard word embedding. This relational word embedding is still learned from co-occurrence statistics, and can thus be used even when no external knowledge base is available. Our analysis shows that relational word vectors do indeed capture information that is complementary to what is encoded in standard word embeddings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.
2 papers.