mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Generalization Gap in Reparameterizable Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 1905.12654 ↗First posted 29 May 2019cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding generalization in reinforcement learning (RL) is a significant challenge, as many common assumptions of traditional supervised learning theory do not apply. We focus on the special class of reparameterizable RL problems, where the trajectory distribution can be decomposed using the reparametrization trick. For this problem class, estimating the expected return is efficient and the trajectory can be computed deterministically given peripheral random variables, which enables us to study reparametrizable RL using supervised learning and transfer learning theory. Through these relationships, we derive guarantees on the gap between the expected and empirical return for both intrinsic and external errors, based on Rademacher complexity as well as the PAC-Bayes bound. Our bound suggests the generalization capability of reparameterizable RL is related to multiple factors including "smoothness" of the environment transition, reward and agent policy function class. We also empirically verify the relationship between the generalization gap and these factors through simulations.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 239
  2. 2021SECANT: Self-Expert Cloning for Zero-Shot Generalization of Visual Policiescited by 43
  3. 2021When Is Generalizable Reinforcement Learning Tractable?cited by 20
  4. 2023Promoting Generalization for Exact Solvers via Adversarial Instance Augmentationcited by 12
  5. 2026RFS: Reinforcement Learning with Residual Flow Steering for Dexterous Manipulationcited by 10
  6. 2021Model-free Policy Learning with Reward Gradientscited by 9
  7. 2022Offline Policy Optimization with Eligible Actionscited by 7
  8. 2022On the Power of Pre-training for Generalization in RL: Provable Benefits and Hardnesscited by 7
  9. 2023Temporal Transfer Learning for Traffic Optimization with Coarse-grained Advisory Autonomycited by 6
  10. 2024Understanding What Affects the Generalization Gap in Visual Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Empirical Evidencecited by 5
  11. 2024Robustness and Generalization in Quantum Reinforcement Learning via Lipschitz Regularizationcited by 4
  12. 2025Provable Zero-Shot Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
10 more
  1. 2023Adversarial Style Transfer for Robust Policy Optimization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  2. 2024Efficient Training of Generalizable Visuomotor Policies via Control-Aware Augmentationcited by 1
  3. 2024Adapting Image-based RL Policies via Predicted Rewardscited by 1
  4. 2025Curriculum-Adapted Robust Reinforcement Learning for UAV Deconfliction in Adversarial Environmentscited by 1
  5. 2026Sample-Efficient Neurosymbolic Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  6. 2026PRISM: Parallel Reward Integration with Symmetry for MORLcited by 1
  7. 2026Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 1
  8. 2025DRIFT: Data Reduction via Informative Feature Transformation- Generalization Begins Before Deep Learning startscited by 0
  9. 2026Rationality Measurement and Theory for Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 0
  10. 2026Sample-efficient Neuro-symbolic Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 0