mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Coresets for Regularized Loss Minimization

arXiv 1905.10845 ↗First posted 26 May 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We design and mathematically analyze sampling-based algorithms for regularized loss minimization problems that are implementable in popular computational models for large data, in which the access to the data is restricted in some way. Our main result is that if the regularizer's effect does not become negligible as the norm of the hypothesis scales, and as the data scales, then a uniform sample of modest size is with high probability a coreset. In the case that the loss function is either logistic regression or soft-margin support vector machines, and the regularizer is one of the common recommended choices, this result implies that a uniform sample of size O(d √n) is with high probability a coreset of n points in Red. We contrast this upper bound with two lower bounds. The first lower bound shows that our analysis of uniform sampling is tight; that is, a smaller uniform sample will likely not be a core set. The second lower bound shows that in some sense uniform sampling is close to optimal, as significantly smaller core sets do not generally exist.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 5.

6 papers.