mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Impact of facial landmark localization on facial expression recognition

arXiv 1905.10784 ↗First posted 26 May 2019cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although facial landmark localization (FLL) approaches are becoming increasingly accurate for characterizing facial regions, one question remains unanswered: what is the impact of these approaches on subsequent related tasks? In this paper, the focus is put on facial expression recognition (FER), where facial landmarks are used for face registration, which is a common usage. Since the most used datasets for facial landmark localization do not allow for a proper measurement of performance according to the different difficulties (e.g., pose, expression, illumination, occlusion, motion blur), we also quantify the performance of recent approaches in the presence of head pose variations and facial expressions. Finally, a study of the impact of these approaches on FER is conducted. We show that the landmark accuracy achieved so far optimizing the conventional Euclidean distance does not necessarily guarantee a gain in performance for FER. To deal with this issue, we propose a new evaluation metric for FLL adapted to FER.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

7 papers.