mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MatchZoo: A Learning, Practicing, and Developing System for Neural Text Matching

arXiv 1905.10289 ↗First posted 24 May 2019cs.IR cs.CLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text matching is the core problem in many natural language processing (NLP) tasks, such as information retrieval, question answering, and conversation. Recently, deep leaning technology has been widely adopted for text matching, making neural text matching a new and active research domain. With a large number of neural matching models emerging rapidly, it becomes more and more difficult for researchers, especially those newcomers, to learn and understand these new models. Moreover, it is usually difficult to try these models due to the tedious data pre-processing, complicated parameter configuration, and massive optimization tricks, not to mention the unavailability of public codes sometimes. Finally, for researchers who want to develop new models, it is also not an easy task to implement a neural text matching model from scratch, and to compare with a bunch of existing models. In this paper, therefore, we present a novel system, namely MatchZoo, to facilitate the learning, practicing and designing of neural text matching models. The system consists of a powerful matching library and a user-friendly and interactive studio, which can help researchers: 1) to learn state-of-the-art neural text matching models systematically, 2) to train, test and apply these models with simple configurable steps; and 3) to develop their own models with rich APIs and assistance.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021B-PROP: Bootstrapped Pre-training with Representative Words Prediction for Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 25
  2. 2024Utilizing BERT for Information Retrieval: Survey, Applications, Resources, and Challengescited by 20
  3. 2021Learning Fine-grained Fact-Article Correspondence in Legal Casescited by 15
  4. 2025Training a Utility-based Retriever Through Shared Context Attribution for Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 13
  5. 2025VeriCite: Towards Reliable Citations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Rigorous Verificationcited by 8
  6. 2021Graph-augmented Learning to Rank for Querying Large-scale Knowledge Graphcited by 7
  7. 2021Unsupervised Matching of Data and Textcited by 7
  8. 2025Large Language Model Sourcing: A Surveycited by 5
  9. 2021On Length Divergence Bias in Textual Matching Modelscited by 3
  10. 2021Self-supervised Answer Retrieval on Clinical Notescited by 2
  11. 2022HumanAL: Calibrating Human Matching Beyond a Single Taskcited by 2
  12. 2021Learning to Rank Question Answer Pairs with Bilateral Contrastive Data Augmentationcited by 1
5 more
  1. 2021TAG: Toward Accurate Social Media Content Tagging with a Concept Graphcited by 1
  2. 2025Distilling a Small Utility-Based Passage Selector to Enhance Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 1
  3. 2021Mirror Matching: Document Matching Approach in Seed-driven Document Ranking for Medical Systematic Reviewscited by 0
  4. 2025ViMRHP: A Vietnamese Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Review Helpfulness Prediction via Human-AI Collaborative Annotationcited by 0
  5. 2026GrocLM: Grocery Category Recommendation in E-Commerce with Large Language Modelscited by 0