Model Validation Using Mutated Training Labels: An Exploratory Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce an exploratory study on Mutation Validation (MV), a model validation method using mutated training labels for supervised learning. MV mutates training data labels, retrains the model against the mutated data, then uses the metamorphic relation that captures the consequent training performance changes to assess model fit. It does not use a validation set or test set. The intuition underpinning MV is that overfitting models tend to fit noise in the training data. We explore 8 different learning algorithms, 18 datasets, and 5 types of hyperparameter tuning tasks. Our results demonstrate that MV is accurate in model selection: the model recommendation hit rate is 92% for MV and less than 60% for out-of-sample-validation. MV also provides more stable hyperparameter tuning results than out-of-sample-validation across different runs.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Keeping Deep Learning Models in Check: A History-Based Approach to Mitigate Overfittingcited by 6
- 2023Empirical Comparison between Cross-Validation and Mutation-Validation in Model Selectioncited by 0
- 2025Intervention Efficiency and Perturbation Validation Framework: Capacity-Aware and Robust Clinical Model Selection under the Rashomon Effectcited by 0
- 2025Intervention Efficiency and Perturbation Validation Framework: Capacity-Aware and Robust Clinical Model Selection under the Rashomon Effect18 Nov 2025
- 2024Keeping Deep Learning Models in Check: A History-Based Approach to Mitigate Overfitting18 Jan 2024
- 2023Empirical Comparison between Cross-Validation and Mutation-Validation in Model Selection23 Nov 2023