ENIGMAWatch: ProofWatch Meets ENIGMA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work we describe a new learning-based proof guidance -- ENIGMAWatch -- for saturation-style first-order theorem provers. ENIGMAWatch combines two guiding approaches for the given-clause selection implemented for the E ATP system: ProofWatch and ENIGMA. ProofWatch is motivated by the watchlist (hints) method and based on symbolic matching of multiple related proofs, while ENIGMA is based on statistical machine learning. The two methods are combined by using the evolving information about symbolic proof matching as an additional information that characterizes the saturation-style proof search for the statistical learning methods. The new system is experimentally evaluated on a large set of problems from the Mizar Library. We show that the added proof-matching information is considered important by the statistical machine learners, and that it leads to improvements in E's Performance over ProofWatch and ENIGMA.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
5 papers.
- 2021Fast and Slow Enigmas and Parental Guidancecited by 8
- 2022The Isabelle ENIGMAcited by 8
- 2024Learning Guided Automated Reasoning: A Brief Surveycited by 7
- 2023MizAR 60 for Mizar 50cited by 6
- 2024Application of AI to formal methods - an analysis of current trendscited by 2
- 2024Application of AI to formal methods - an analysis of current trends22 Nov 2024
- 2024Learning Guided Automated Reasoning: A Brief Survey6 Mar 2024
- 2023MizAR 60 for Mizar 5012 Mar 2023
- 2022The Isabelle ENIGMA4 May 2022
- 2021Fast and Slow Enigmas and Parental Guidance14 Jul 2021