Convergence Analyses of Online ADAM Algorithm in Convex Setting and Two-Layer ReLU Neural Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Nowadays, online learning is an appealing learning paradigm, which is of great interest in practice due to the recent emergence of large scale applications such as online advertising placement and online web ranking. Standard online learning assumes a finite number of samples while in practice data is streamed infinitely. In such a setting gradient descent with a diminishing learning rate does not work. We first introduce regret with rolling window, a new performance metric for online streaming learning, which measures the performance of an algorithm on every fixed number of contiguous samples. At the same time, we propose a family of algorithms based on gradient descent with a constant or adaptive learning rate and provide very technical analyses establishing regret bound properties of the algorithms. We cover the convex setting showing the regret of the order of the square root of the size of the window in the constant and dynamic learning rate scenarios. Our proof is applicable also to the standard online setting where we provide the first analysis of the same regret order (the previous proofs have flaws). We also study a two layer neural network setting with ReLU activation. In this case we establish that if initial weights are close to a stationary point, the same square root regret bound is attainable. We conduct computational experiments demonstrating a superior performance of the proposed algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Toward Understanding Why Adam Converges Faster Than SGD for Transformerscited by 50
- 2022Fast Adversarial Training with Adaptive Step Sizecited by 24
- 2022Maximizing Communication Efficiency for Large-scale Training via 0/1 Adamcited by 15
- 2022Divergence Results and Convergence of a Variance Reduced Version of ADAMcited by 8
- 2023Toward Understanding Why Adam Converges Faster Than SGD for Transformers31 May 2023
- 2022Divergence Results and Convergence of a Variance Reduced Version of ADAM11 Oct 2022
- 2022Fast Adversarial Training with Adaptive Step Size6 Jun 2022
- 2022Maximizing Communication Efficiency for Large-scale Training via 0/1 Adam12 Feb 2022