mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Comparison of Stereo-Matching Cost between Convolutional Neural Network and Census for Satellite Images

arXiv 1905.09147 ↗First posted 22 May 2019cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Stereo dense image matching can be categorized to low-level feature based matching and deep feature based matching according to their matching cost metrics. Census has been proofed to be one of the most efficient low-level feature based matching methods, while fast Convolutional Neural Network (fst-CNN), as a deep feature based method, has small computing time and is robust for satellite images. Thus, a comparison between fst-CNN and census is critical for further studies in stereo dense image matching. This paper used cost function of fst-CNN and census to do stereo matching, then utilized semi-global matching method to obtain optimized disparity images. Those images are used to produce digital surface model to compare with ground truth points. It addresses that fstCNN performs better than census in the aspect of absolute matching accuracy, histogram of error distribution and matching completeness, but these two algorithms still performs in the same order of magnitude.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.