A Comparative Review of Microservices and Monolithic Architectures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Microservices' architecture is getting attention in the academic community and the industry, and mostly is compared with monolithic architecture. Plenty of the results of these research papers contradict each other regarding the performance of these architectures. Therefore, these two architectures are compared in this paper, and some specific configurations of microservices' applications are evaluated as well in the term of service discovery. Monolithic architecture in concurrency testing showed better performance in throughput by 6% when compared to microservices architecture. The load testing scenario did not present significant difference between the two architectures. Furthermore, a third test comparing microservices applications built with different service discovery technologies such as Consul and Eureka showed that applications with Consul presented better results in terms of throughput.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.
2 papers.