mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A comprehensive study of speech separation: spectrogram vs waveform separation

arXiv 1905.07497 ↗First posted 17 May 2019cs.SD cs.LG eess.AScited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Speech separation has been studied widely for single-channel close-talk microphone recordings over the past few years; developed solutions are mostly in frequency-domain. Recently, a raw audio waveform separation network (TasNet) is introduced for single-channel data, with achieving high Si-SNR (scale-invariant source-to-noise ratio) and SDR (source-to-distortion ratio) comparing against the state-of-the-art solution in frequency-domain. In this study, we incorporate effective components of the TasNet into a frequency-domain separation method. We compare both for alternative scenarios. We introduce a solution for directly optimizing the separation criterion in frequency-domain networks. In addition to speech separation objective and subjective measurements, we evaluate the separation performance on a speech recognition task as well. We study the speech separation problem for far-field data (more similar to naturalistic audio streams) and develop multi-channel solutions for both frequency and time-domain separators with utilizing spectral, spatial and speaker location information. For our experiments, we simulated multi-channel spatialized reverberate WSJ0-2mix dataset. Our experimental results show that spectrogram separation can achieve competitive performance with better network design. Multi-channel framework as well is shown to improve the single-channel performance relatively up to +35.5% and +46% in terms of WER and SDR, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1.

6 papers.