mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Representation of White- and Black-Box Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networks and Humans: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

arXiv 1905.02422 ↗First posted 7 May 2019q-bio.NC cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent success of brain-inspired deep neural networks (DNNs) in solving complex, high-level visual tasks has led to rising expectations for their potential to match the human visual system. However, DNNs exhibit idiosyncrasies that suggest their visual representation and processing might be substantially different from human vision. One limitation of DNNs is that they are vulnerable to adversarial examples, input images on which subtle, carefully designed noises are added to fool a machine classifier. The robustness of the human visual system against adversarial examples is potentially of great importance as it could uncover a key mechanistic feature that machine vision is yet to incorporate. In this study, we compare the visual representations of white- and black-box adversarial examples in DNNs and humans by leveraging functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We find a small but significant difference in representation patterns for different (i.e. white- versus black- box) types of adversarial examples for both humans and DNNs. However, human performance on categorical judgment is not degraded by noise regardless of the type unlike DNN. These results suggest that adversarial examples may be differentially represented in the human visual system, but unable to affect the perceptual experience.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.