mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Better Data Labelling with EMBLEM (and how that Impacts Defect Prediction)

arXiv 1905.01719 ↗First posted 5 May 2019cs.SEcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard automatic methods for recognizing problematic development commits can be greatly improved via the incremental application of human+artificial expertise. In this approach, called EMBLEM, an AI tool first explore the software development process to label commits that are most problematic. Humans then apply their expertise to check those labels (perhaps resulting in the AI updating the support vectors within their SVM learner). We recommend this human+AI partnership, for several reasons. When a new domain is encountered, EMBLEM can learn better ways to label which comments refer to real problems. Also, in studies with 9 open source software projects, labelling via EMBLEM's incremental application of human+AI is at least an order of magnitude cheaper than existing methods (≈ eight times). Further, EMBLEM is very effective. For the data sets explored here, EMBLEM better labelling methods significantly improved Popt20 and G-scores performance in nearly all the projects studied here.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: