Meta-learners' learning dynamics are unlike learners'
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Meta-learning is a tool that allows us to build sample-efficient learning systems. Here we show that, once meta-trained, LSTM Meta-Learners aren't just faster learners than their sample-inefficient deep learning (DL) and reinforcement learning (RL) brethren, but that they actually pursue fundamentally different learning trajectories. We study their learning dynamics on three sets of structured tasks for which the corresponding learning dynamics of DL and RL systems have been previously described: linear regression (Saxe et al., 2013), nonlinear regression (Rahaman et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2018), and contextual bandits (Schaul et al., 2019). In each case, while sample-inefficient DL and RL Learners uncover the task structure in a staggered manner, meta-trained LSTM Meta-Learners uncover almost all task structure concurrently, congruent with the patterns expected from Bayes-optimal inference algorithms. This has implications for research areas wherever the learning behaviour itself is of interest, such as safety, curriculum design, and human-in-the-loop machine learning.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Uncovering mesa-optimization algorithms in Transformerscited by 100
- 2022Overview frequency principle/spectral bias in deep learningcited by 69
- 2024Multi-agent cooperation through learning-aware policy gradientscited by 4
- 2024Multi-agent cooperation through learning-aware policy gradients24 Oct 2024
- 2023Uncovering mesa-optimization algorithms in Transformers11 Sep 2023
- 2022Overview frequency principle/spectral bias in deep learning19 Jan 2022