mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Communication trade-offs for synchronized distributed SGD with large step size

arXiv 1904.11325 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2019cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Synchronous mini-batch SGD is state-of-the-art for large-scale distributed machine learning. However, in practice, its convergence is bottlenecked by slow communication rounds between worker nodes. A natural solution to reduce communication is to use the `local-SGD' model in which the workers train their model independently and synchronize every once in a while. This algorithm improves the computation-communication trade-off but its convergence is not understood very well. We propose a non-asymptotic error analysis, which enables comparison to one-shot averaging i.e., a single communication round among independent workers, and mini-batch averaging i.e., communicating at every step. We also provide adaptive lower bounds on the communication frequency for large step-sizes ( t-α , α∈ (1/2 , 1 ) ) and show that Local-SGD reduces communication by a factor of OBig(frac√TP3/2Big), with T the total number of gradients and P machines.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.