Computer-aided diagnosis in histopathological images of the endometrium using a convolutional neural network and attention mechanisms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uterine cancer, also known as endometrial cancer, can seriously affect the female reproductive organs, and histopathological image analysis is the gold standard for diagnosing endometrial cancer. However, due to the limited capability of modeling the complicated relationships between histopathological images and their interpretations, these computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) approaches based on traditional machine learning algorithms often failed to achieve satisfying results. In this study, we developed a CADx approach using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and attention mechanisms, called HIENet. Because HIENet used the attention mechanisms and feature map visualization techniques, it can provide pathologists better interpretability of diagnoses by highlighting the histopathological correlations of local (pixel-level) image features to morphological characteristics of endometrial tissue. In the ten-fold cross-validation process, the CADx approach, HIENet, achieved a 76.91 ± 1.17% (mean ± s. d.) classification accuracy for four classes of endometrial tissue, namely normal endometrium, endometrial polyp, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrial adenocarcinoma. Also, HIENet achieved an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.9579 ± 0.0103 with an 81.04 ± 3.87% sensitivity and 94.78 ± 0.87% specificity in a binary classification task that detected endometrioid adenocarcinoma (Malignant). Besides, in the external validation process, HIENet achieved an 84.50% accuracy in the four-class classification task, and it achieved an AUC of 0.9829 with a 77.97% (95% CI, 65.27%-87.71%) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI, 97.42%-100.00%) specificity. In summary, the proposed CADx approach, HIENet, outperformed three human experts and four end-to-end CNN-based classifiers on this small-scale dataset composed of 3,500 hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images regarding overall classification performance.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysiscited by 147
- 2021A Hierarchical Conditional Random Field-based Attention Mechanism Approach for Gastric Histopathology Image Classificationcited by 9
- 2023Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracycited by 9
- 2022Feature transforms for image data augmentationcited by 3
- 2021Cervical Optical Coherence Tomography Image Classification Based on Contrastive Self-Supervised Texture Learningcited by 1
- 2021Gram Barcodes for Histopathology Tissue Texture Retrievalcited by 0
- 2022AI-based Carcinoma Detection and Classification Using Histopathological Images: A Systematic Reviewcited by 0
- 2023EndoNet: model for automatic calculation of H-score on histological slidescited by 0
- 2023EndoNet: model for automatic calculation of H-score on histological slides22 Aug 2023
- 2023Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy13 Jun 2023
- 2022Feature transforms for image data augmentation24 Jan 2022
- 2022AI-based Carcinoma Detection and Classification Using Histopathological Images: A Systematic Review18 Jan 2022
- 2021Gram Barcodes for Histopathology Tissue Texture Retrieval28 Nov 2021
- 2021Cervical Optical Coherence Tomography Image Classification Based on Contrastive Self-Supervised Texture Learning11 Aug 2021
- 2021Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis22 Jul 2021
- 2021A Hierarchical Conditional Random Field-based Attention Mechanism Approach for Gastric Histopathology Image Classification21 Feb 2021