CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data quality affects machine learning (ML) model performances, and data scientists spend considerable amount of time on data cleaning before model training. However, to date, there does not exist a rigorous study on how exactly cleaning affects ML -- ML community usually focuses on developing ML algorithms that are robust to some particular noise types of certain distributions, while database (DB) community has been mostly studying the problem of data cleaning alone without considering how data is consumed by downstream ML analytics. We propose a CleanML study that systematically investigates the impact of data cleaning on ML classification tasks. The open-source and extensible CleanML study currently includes 14 real-world datasets with real errors, five common error types, seven different ML models, and multiple cleaning algorithms for each error type (including both commonly used algorithms in practice as well as state-of-the-art solutions in academic literature). We control the randomness in ML experiments using statistical hypothesis testing, and we also control false discovery rate in our experiments using the Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY) procedure. We analyze the results in a systematic way to derive many interesting and nontrivial observations. We also put forward multiple research directions for researchers.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 203
- 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
- 2021A Data Quality-Driven View of MLOpscited by 31
- 2023REIN: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Data Cleaning Methods in ML Pipelinescited by 10
- 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 9
- 2024Towards Interactively Improving ML Data Preparation Code via "Shadow Pipelines"cited by 1
- 2026Measuring the Sensitivity of Classification Models with the Error Sensitivity Profilecited by 0
- 2026Measuring the Sensitivity of Classification Models with the Error Sensitivity Profile28 Apr 2026
- 2024Towards Interactively Improving ML Data Preparation Code via "Shadow Pipelines"30 Apr 2024
- 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Review3 Oct 2023
- 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Survey17 Mar 2023
- 2023REIN: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Data Cleaning Methods in ML Pipelines9 Feb 2023
- 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspective13 Dec 2021
- 2021A Data Quality-Driven View of MLOps15 Feb 2021