mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are State-of-the-art Visual Place Recognition Techniques any Good for Aerial Robotics?

arXiv 1904.07967 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2019cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Place Recognition (VPR) has seen significant advances at the frontiers of matching performance and computational superiority over the past few years. However, these evaluations are performed for ground-based mobile platforms and cannot be generalized to aerial platforms. The degree of viewpoint variation experienced by aerial robots is complex, with their processing power and on-board memory limited by payload size and battery ratings. Therefore, in this paper, we collect 8 state-of-the-art VPR techniques that have been previously evaluated for ground-based platforms and compare them on 2 recently proposed aerial place recognition datasets with three prime focuses: a) Matching performance b) Processing power consumption c) Projected memory requirements. This gives a birds-eye view of the applicability of contemporary VPR research to aerial robotics and lays down the the nature of challenges for aerial-VPR.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.