The ILLTP Library for Intuitionistic Linear Logic
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Benchmarking automated theorem proving (ATP) systems using standardized problem sets is a well-established method for measuring their performance. However, the availability of such libraries for non-classical logics is very limited. In this work we propose a library for benchmarking Girard's (propositional) intuitionistic linear logic. For a quick bootstrapping of the collection of problems, and for discussing the selection of relevant problems and understanding their meaning as linear logic theorems, we use translations of the collection of Kleene's intuitionistic theorems in the traditional monograph "Introduction to Metamathematics". We analyze four different translations of intuitionistic logic into linear logic and compare their proofs using a linear logic based prover with focusing. In order to enhance the set of problems in our library, we apply the three provability-preserving translations to the propositional benchmarks in the ILTP Library. Finally, we generate a comprehensive set of reachability problems for Petri nets and encode such problems as linear logic sequents, thus enlarging our collection of problems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Adversarial Learning to Reason in an Arbitrary Logiccited by 1
- 2022Adversarial Learning to Reason in an Arbitrary Logic6 Apr 2022