Average Sensitivity of Graph Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In modern applications of graphs algorithms, where the graphs of interest are large and dynamic, it is unrealistic to assume that an input representation contains the full information of a graph being studied. Hence, it is desirable to use algorithms that, even when only a (large) subgraph is available, output solutions that are close to the solutions output when the whole graph is available. We formalize this idea by introducing the notion of average sensitivity of graph algorithms, which is the average earth mover's distance between the output distributions of an algorithm on a graph and its subgraph obtained by removing an edge, where the average is over the edges removed and the distance between two outputs is the Hamming distance. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of average sensitivity. After deriving basic properties of average sensitivity such as composition, we provide efficient approximation algorithms with low average sensitivities for concrete graph problems, including the minimum spanning forest problem, the global minimum cut problem, the minimum s-t cut problem, and the maximum matching problem. In addition, we prove that the average sensitivity of our global minimum cut algorithm is almost optimal, by showing a nearly matching lower bound. We also show that every algorithm for the 2-coloring problem has average sensitivity linear in the number of vertices. One of the main ideas involved in designing our algorithms with low average sensitivity is the following fact; if the presence of a vertex or an edge in the solution output by an algorithm can be decided locally, then the algorithm has a low average sensitivity, allowing us to reuse the analyses of known sublinear-time algorithms and local computation algorithms (LCAs). Using this connection, we show that every LCA for 2-coloring has linear query complexity, thereby answering an open question.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021Mask-GVAE: Blind Denoising Graphs via Partitioncited by 9
- 2024Collaboration! Towards Robust Neural Methods for Routing Problemscited by 9
- 2023A Batch-to-Online Transformation under Random-Order Modelcited by 2
- 2024Replicability is Asymptotically Free in Multi-armed Banditscited by 2
- 2025Online Learning in the Random Order Modelcited by 2
- 2021A General Framework for Evaluating Robustness of Combinatorial Optimization Solvers on Graphscited by 0
- 2026Adversarial Instance Generation and Robust Training for Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Multiple Objectivescited by 0
- 2026From Average Sensitivity to Small-Loss Regret Bounds under Random-Order Modelcited by 0
- 2026From Average Sensitivity to Small-Loss Regret Bounds under Random-Order Model10 Feb 2026
- 2026Adversarial Instance Generation and Robust Training for Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Multiple Objectives4 Jan 2026
- 2025Online Learning in the Random Order Model3 Oct 2025
- 2024Collaboration! Towards Robust Neural Methods for Routing Problems7 Oct 2024
- 2024Replicability is Asymptotically Free in Multi-armed Bandits12 Feb 2024
- 2023A Batch-to-Online Transformation under Random-Order Model12 Jun 2023
- 2021A General Framework for Evaluating Robustness of Combinatorial Optimization Solvers on Graphs28 Dec 2021
- 2021Mask-GVAE: Blind Denoising Graphs via Partition8 Feb 2021