mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sample Complexity Lower Bounds for Linear System Identification

arXiv 1903.10343 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2019eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper establishes problem-specific sample complexity lower bounds for linear system identification problems. The sample complexity is defined in the PAC framework: it corresponds to the time it takes to identify the system parameters with prescribed accuracy and confidence levels. By problem-specific, we mean that the lower bound explicitly depends on the system to be identified (which contrasts with minimax lower bounds), and hence really captures the identification hardness specific to the system. We consider both uncontrolled and controlled systems. For uncontrolled systems, the lower bounds are valid for any linear system, stable or not, and only depend of the system finite-time controllability gramian. A simplified lower bound depending on the spectrum of the system only is also derived. In view of recent finitetime analysis of classical estimation methods (e.g. ordinary least squares), our sample complexity lower bounds are tight for many systems. For controlled systems, our lower bounds are not as explicit as in the case of uncontrolled systems, but could well provide interesting insights into the design of control policy with minimal sample complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspectivecited by 53
  2. 2023Stochastic Gradient Descent under Markovian Sampling Schemescited by 38
  3. 2021Linear Systems can be Hard to Learncited by 20
  4. 2021Streaming Linear System Identification with Reverse Experience Replaycited by 17
  5. 2021Task-Optimal Exploration in Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 15
  6. 2022Learning Mixtures of Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 15
  7. 2022Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systemscited by 11
  8. 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hardcited by 11
  9. 2021Non asymptotic estimation lower bounds for LTI state space models with Cram'er-Rao and van Treescited by 3
  10. 2022Distributed Online System Identification for LTI Systems Using Reverse Experience Replaycited by 3
  11. 2024Sample Complexity Bounds for Linear System Identification from a Finite Setcited by 3
  12. 2024Long-Context Linear System Identificationcited by 3
8 more
  1. 2022Robust Data-Driven Output Feedback Control via Bootstrapped Multiplicative Noisecited by 1
  2. 2023SAMoSSA: Multivariate Singular Spectrum Analysis with Stochastic Autoregressive Noisecited by 1
  3. 2023On the Hardness of Learning to Stabilize Linear Systemscited by 1
  4. 2025High Effort, Low Gain: Fundamental Limits of Active Learning for Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 1
  5. 2025Frequency Response Identification of Low-Order Systems: Finite-Sample Analysiscited by 0
  6. 2025Near-optimal Rank Adaptive Inference of High Dimensional Matricescited by 0
  7. 2025Symmetric Linear Dynamical Systems are Learnable from Few Observationscited by 0
  8. 2026CLT-Optimal Parameter Error Bounds for Linear System Identificationcited by 0