Robust Neural Networks using Randomized Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper tackles the problem of defending a neural network against adversarial attacks crafted with different norms (in particular ℓ_∞ and ℓ2 bounded adversarial examples). It has been observed that defense mechanisms designed to protect against one type of attacks often offer poor performance against the other. We show that ℓ_∞ defense mechanisms cannot offer good protection against ℓ2 attacks and vice-versa, and we provide both theoretical and empirical insights on this phenomenon. Then, we discuss various ways of combining existing defense mechanisms in order to train neural networks robust against both types of attacks. Our experiments show that these new defense mechanisms offer better protection when attacked with both norms.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Random Boxes Are Open-world Object Detectorscited by 24
- 2021Explainable Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks Using Activation Profilescited by 6
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Surveycited by 6
- 2021Random Projections for Improved Adversarial Robustnesscited by 1
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Survey19 Oct 2024
- 2023Random Boxes Are Open-world Object Detectors17 Jul 2023
- 2021Explainable Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks Using Activation Profiles18 Mar 2021
- 2021Random Projections for Improved Adversarial Robustness18 Feb 2021