Expert-Augmented Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning is proving invaluable across disciplines. However, its success is often limited by the quality and quantity of available data, while its adoption by the level of trust that models afford users. Human vs. machine performance is commonly compared empirically to decide whether a certain task should be performed by a computer or an expert. In reality, the optimal learning strategy may involve combining the complementary strengths of man and machine. Here we present Expert-Augmented Machine Learning (EAML), an automated method that guides the extraction of expert knowledge and its integration into machine-learned models. We use a large dataset of intensive care patient data to predict mortality and show that we can extract expert knowledge using an online platform, help reveal hidden confounders, improve generalizability on a different population and learn using less data. EAML presents a novel framework for high performance and dependable machine learning in critical applications.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
- 2022On Tackling Explanation Redundancy in Decision Treescited by 44
- 2021Preferential Mixture-of-Experts: Interpretable Models that Rely on Human Expertise as much as Possiblecited by 19
- 2021Learning-to-defer for sequential medical decision-making under uncertaintycited by 10
- 2022Improving ECG Classification Interpretability using Saliency Mapscited by 9
- 2023Navigating Alignment for Non-identical Client Class Sets: A Label Name-Anchored Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 6
- 2022Modern Views of Machine Learning for Precision Psychiatrycited by 5
- 2024Data-Centric Approach to Constrained Machine Learning: A Case Study on Conway's Game of Lifecited by 2
- 2022Using Word Embeddings to Analyze Protests Newscited by 0
- 2024Learning-Augmented K-Means Clustering Using Dimensional Reductioncited by 0
- 2025Your Model Is Unfair, Are You Even Aware? Inverse Relationship Between Comprehension and Trust in Explainability Visualizations of Biased ML Modelscited by 0
- 2026Enhancing the Reliability of Medical AI through Expert-guided Uncertainty Modelingcited by 0
- 2026Enhancing the Reliability of Medical AI through Expert-guided Uncertainty Modeling2 Apr 2026
- 2025Your Model Is Unfair, Are You Even Aware? Inverse Relationship Between Comprehension and Trust in Explainability Visualizations of Biased ML Models31 Jul 2025
- 2024Data-Centric Approach to Constrained Machine Learning: A Case Study on Conway's Game of Life23 Aug 2024
- 2024Learning-Augmented K-Means Clustering Using Dimensional Reduction6 Jan 2024
- 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Making14 Jan 2023
- 2023Navigating Alignment for Non-identical Client Class Sets: A Label Name-Anchored Federated Learning Framework1 Jan 2023
- 2022On Tackling Explanation Redundancy in Decision Trees20 May 2022
- 2022Modern Views of Machine Learning for Precision Psychiatry4 Apr 2022
- 2022Using Word Embeddings to Analyze Protests News11 Mar 2022
- 2022Improving ECG Classification Interpretability using Saliency Maps10 Jan 2022
- 2021Learning-to-defer for sequential medical decision-making under uncertainty13 Sep 2021
- 2021Preferential Mixture-of-Experts: Interpretable Models that Rely on Human Expertise as much as Possible13 Jan 2021