mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Low Resource Text Classification with ULMFit and Backtranslation

arXiv 1903.09244 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2019cs.CL cs.LGcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In computer vision, virtually every state-of-the-art deep learning system is trained with data augmentation. In text classification, however, data augmentation is less widely practiced because it must be performed before training and risks introducing label noise. We augment the IMDB movie reviews dataset with examples generated by two families of techniques: random token perturbations introduced by Wei and Zou [2019] and backtranslation -- translating to a second language then back to English. In low resource environments, backtranslation generates significant improvement on top of the state of-the-art ULMFit model. A ULMFit model pretrained on wikitext103 and then fine-tuned on only 50 IMDB examples and 500 synthetic examples generated by backtranslation achieves 80.6% accuracy, an 8.1% improvement over the augmentation-free baseline with only 9 minutes of additional training time. Random token perturbations do not yield any improvements but incur equivalent computational cost. The benefits of training with backtranslated examples decreases with the size of the available training data. On the full dataset, neither augmentation technique improves upon ULMFit's state of the art performance. We address this by using backtranslations as a form of test time augmentation as well as ensembling ULMFit with other models, and achieve small improvements.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 2; 2023: 7; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Limited Data Learning in NLPcited by 101
  2. 2021ESimCSE: Enhanced Sample Building Method for Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Sentence Embeddingcited by 73
  3. 2021Generate, Annotate, and Learn: NLP with Synthetic Textcited by 42
  4. 2022Text Smoothing: Enhance Various Data Augmentation Methods on Text Classification Taskscited by 13
  5. 2021TOD-DA: Towards Boosting the Robustness of Task-oriented Dialogue Modeling on Spoken Conversationscited by 11
  6. 2021Data Augmentation in a Hybrid Approach for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysiscited by 10
  7. 2023Self-Evolution Learning for Mixup: Enhance Data Augmentation on Few-Shot Text Classification Taskscited by 5
  8. 2023Bridging the Gap between Decision and Logits in Decision-based Knowledge Distillation for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 5
  9. 2024An Effective Deployment of Diffusion LM for Data Augmentation in Low-Resource Sentiment Classificationcited by 5
  10. 2023STA: Self-controlled Text Augmentation for Improving Text Classificationscited by 2
  11. 2025Concept Extraction for Time Series with ECLAD-tscited by 2
  12. 2025A Context-aware Attention and Graph Neural Network-based Multimodal Framework for Misogyny Detectioncited by 2
8 more
  1. 2023Adversarial Word Dilution as Text Data Augmentation in Low-Resource Regimecited by 1
  2. 2021A Diversity-Enhanced and Constraints-Relaxed Augmentation for Low-Resource Classificationcited by 0
  3. 2021Exploiting All Samples in Low-Resource Sentence Classification: Early Stopping and Initialization Parameterscited by 0
  4. 2022Improving Persian Relation Extraction Models by Data Augmentationcited by 0
  5. 2023Coping with low data availability for social media crisis message categorisationcited by 0
  6. 2023Investigating Masking-based Data Generation in Language Modelscited by 0
  7. 2023Summarization-based Data Augmentation for Document Classificationcited by 0
  8. 2024Advancing NLP Models with Strategic Text Augmentation: A Comprehensive Study of Augmentation Methods and Curriculum Strategiescited by 0