mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Levelling the Playing Field: A Comprehensive Comparison of Visual Place Recognition Approaches under Changing Conditions

arXiv 1903.09107 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2019cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years there has been significant improvement in the capability of Visual Place Recognition (VPR) methods, building on the success of both hand-crafted and learnt visual features, temporal filtering and usage of semantic scene information. The wide range of approaches and the relatively recent growth in interest in the field has meant that a wide range of datasets and assessment methodologies have been proposed, often with a focus only on precision-recall type metrics, making comparison difficult. In this paper we present a comprehensive approach to evaluating the performance of 10 state-of-the-art recently-developed VPR techniques, which utilizes three standardized metrics: (a) Matching Performance b) Matching Time c) Memory Footprint. Together this analysis provides an up-to-date and widely encompassing snapshot of the various strengths and weaknesses of contemporary approaches to the VPR problem. The aim of this work is to help move this particular research field towards a more mature and unified approach to the problem, enabling better comparison and hence more progress to be made in future research.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: