Quantum hardness of learning shallow classical circuits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we study the quantum learnability of constant-depth classical circuits under the uniform distribution and in the distribution-independent framework of PAC learning. In order to attain our results, we establish connections between quantum learning and quantum-secure cryptosystems. We then achieve the following results. 1) Hardness of learning AC0 and TC0 under the uniform distribution. Our first result concerns the concept class TC0 (resp. AC0), the class of constant-depth and polynomial-sized circuits with unbounded fan-in majority gates (resp. AND, OR, NOT gates). We show that if there exists no quantum polynomial-time (resp. strong sub-exponential time) algorithm to solve the Ring Learning with Errors (RLWE) problem, then there exists no polynomial-time quantum learning algorithm for TC0 (resp. AC0) under the uniform distribution (even with access to quantum membership queries). The main technique in this result uses explicit pseudo-random functions that are believed to be quantum-secure to construct concept classes that are hard to learn quantumly under the uniform distribution. 2) Hardness of learning TC02 in the PAC setting. Our second result shows that if there exists no quantum polynomial time algorithm for the LWE problem, then there exists no polynomial time quantum PAC learning algorithm for the class TC02, i.e., depth-2 TC0 circuits. The main technique in this result is to establish a connection between the quantum security of public-key cryptosystems and the learnability of a concept class that consists of decryption functions of the cryptosystem. This gives a strong (conditional) negative answer to one of the "Ten Semi-Grand Challenges for Quantum Computing Theory" raised by Aaronson [Aar05], who asked if AC0 and TC0 can be PAC-learned in quantum polynomial time.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical datacited by 15
- 2023On the average-case complexity of learning output distributions of quantum circuitscited by 9
- 2024An unconditional distribution learning advantage with shallow quantum circuitscited by 2
- 2022Clifford Circuits can be Properly PAC Learned if and only if textsfRP=textsfNPcited by 1
- 2024Noise-tolerant learnability of shallow quantum circuits from statistics and the cost of quantum pseudorandomnesscited by 0
- 2025Learning to erase quantum states: thermodynamic implications of quantum learning theorycited by 0
- 2026The Quantum Learning Menagerie (A survey on Quantum learning for Classical concepts)cited by 0
- 2026The Quantum Learning Menagerie (A survey on Quantum learning for Classical concepts)1 Feb 2026
- 2025Learning to erase quantum states: thermodynamic implications of quantum learning theory9 Apr 2025
- 2024An unconditional distribution learning advantage with shallow quantum circuits23 Nov 2024
- 2024Noise-tolerant learnability of shallow quantum circuits from statistics and the cost of quantum pseudorandomness20 May 2024
- 2023On the average-case complexity of learning output distributions of quantum circuits9 May 2023
- 2022On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical data12 Aug 2022
- 2022Clifford Circuits can be Properly PAC Learned if and only if textsfRP=textsfNP13 Apr 2022