A Replication Study: Machine Learning Models Are Capable of Predicting Sexual Orientation From Facial Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research used machine learning methods to predict a person's sexual orientation from their photograph (Wang and Kosinski, 2017). To verify this result, two of these models are replicated, one based on a deep neural network (DNN) and one on facial morphology (FM). Using a new dataset of 20,910 photographs from dating websites, the ability to predict sexual orientation is confirmed (DNN accuracy male 68%, female 77%, FM male 62%, female 72%). To investigate whether facial features such as brightness or predominant colours are predictive of sexual orientation, a new model based on highly blurred facial images was created. This model was also able to predict sexual orientation (male 63%, female 72%). The tested models are invariant to intentional changes to a subject's makeup, eyewear, facial hair and head pose (angle that the photograph is taken at). It is shown that the head pose is not correlated with sexual orientation. While demonstrating that dating profile images carry rich information about sexual orientation these results leave open the question of how much is determined by facial morphology and how much by differences in grooming, presentation and lifestyle. The advent of new technology that is able to detect sexual orientation in this way may have serious implications for the privacy and safety of gay men and women.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021About Face: A Survey of Facial Recognition Evaluationcited by 27
- 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curationcited by 17
- 2023Facial recognition technology and human raters can predict political orientation from images of expressionless faces even when controlling for demographics and self-presentationcited by 2
- 2022Measuring Trustworthiness or Automating Physiognomy? A Comment on Safra, Chevallier, Gr`ezes, and Baumard (2020)cited by 1
- 2021A Mental Trespass? Unveiling Truth, Exposing Thoughts and Threatening Civil Liberties with Non-Invasive AI Lie Detectioncited by 0
- 2023Deep Learning and Ethicscited by 0
- 2024Post-hoc and manifold explanations analysis of facial expression data based on deep learningcited by 0
- 2024Post-hoc and manifold explanations analysis of facial expression data based on deep learning29 Apr 2024
- 2023Deep Learning and Ethics24 May 2023
- 2023Facial recognition technology and human raters can predict political orientation from images of expressionless faces even when controlling for demographics and self-presentation28 Mar 2023
- 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curation7 Feb 2023
- 2022Measuring Trustworthiness or Automating Physiognomy? A Comment on Safra, Chevallier, Gr`ezes, and Baumard (2020)17 Feb 2022
- 2021A Mental Trespass? Unveiling Truth, Exposing Thoughts and Threatening Civil Liberties with Non-Invasive AI Lie Detection16 Feb 2021
- 2021About Face: A Survey of Facial Recognition Evaluation1 Feb 2021