An Editorial Network for Enhanced Document Summarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We suggest a new idea of Editorial Network - a mixed extractive-abstractive summarization approach, which is applied as a post-processing step over a given sequence of extracted sentences. Our network tries to imitate the decision process of a human editor during summarization. Within such a process, each extracted sentence may be either kept untouched, rephrased or completely rejected. We further suggest an effective way for training the "editor" based on a novel soft-labeling approach. Using the CNN/DailyMail dataset we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach compared to state-of-the-art extractive-only or abstractive-only baseline methods.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Subjective Bias in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 5
- 2022Universal Evasion Attacks on Summarization Scoringcited by 2
- 2021Reinforced Abstractive Summarization with Adaptive Length Controllingcited by 0
- 2021Reinforcing Semantic-Symmetry for Document Summarizationcited by 0
- 2021Topic-Aware Encoding for Extractive Summarizationcited by 0
- 2022Universal Evasion Attacks on Summarization Scoring25 Oct 2022
- 2021Topic-Aware Encoding for Extractive Summarization17 Dec 2021
- 2021Reinforcing Semantic-Symmetry for Document Summarization14 Dec 2021
- 2021Reinforced Abstractive Summarization with Adaptive Length Controlling14 Dec 2021
- 2021Subjective Bias in Abstractive Summarization18 Jun 2021