Wasserstein GAN Can Perform PCA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have become a powerful framework to learn generative models that arise across a wide variety of domains. While there has been a recent surge in the development of numerous GAN architectures with distinct optimization metrics, we are still lacking in our understanding on how far away such GANs are from optimality. In this paper, we make progress on a theoretical understanding of the GANs under a simple linear-generator Gaussian-data setting where the optimal maximum-likelihood generator is known to perform Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We find that the original GAN by Goodfellow et. al. fails to recover the optimal PCA solution. On the other hand, we show that Wasserstein GAN can approach the PCA solution in the limit of sample size, and hence it may serve as a basis for an optimal GAN architecture that yields the optimal generator for a wide range of data settings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Neural networks trained with SGD learn distributions of increasing complexitycited by 50
- 2021Wasserstein GANs Work Because They Fail (to Approximate the Wasserstein Distance)cited by 33
- 2021WGAN with an Infinitely Wide Generator Has No Spurious Stationary Pointscited by 1
- 2021On the Optimization Landscape of Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 0
- 2022Neural networks trained with SGD learn distributions of increasing complexity21 Nov 2022
- 2021On the Optimization Landscape of Maximum Mean Discrepancy26 Oct 2021
- 2021Wasserstein GANs Work Because They Fail (to Approximate the Wasserstein Distance)2 Mar 2021
- 2021WGAN with an Infinitely Wide Generator Has No Spurious Stationary Points15 Feb 2021