mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Compositional Representations of Interacting Systems with Restricted Boltzmann Machines: Comparative Study of Lattice Proteins

arXiv 1902.06495 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2019cs.LG physics.data-an q-bio.BMcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) is an unsupervised machine-learning bipartite graphical model that jointly learns a probability distribution over data and extracts their relevant statistical features. As such, RBM were recently proposed for characterizing the patterns of coevolution between amino acids in protein sequences and for designing new sequences. Here, we study how the nature of the features learned by RBM changes with its defining parameters, such as the dimensionality of the representations (size of the hidden layer) and the sparsity of the features. We show that for adequate values of these parameters, RBM operate in a so-called compositional phase in which visible configurations sampled from the RBM are obtained by recombining these features. We then compare the performance of RBM with other standard representation learning algorithms, including Principal or Independent Component Analysis, autoencoders (AE), variational auto-encoders (VAE), and their sparse variants. We show that RBM, due to the stochastic mapping between data configurations and representations, better capture the underlying interactions in the system and are significantly more robust with respect to sample size than deterministic methods such as PCA or ICA. In addition, this stochastic mapping is not prescribed a priori as in VAE, but learned from data, which allows RBM to show good performance even with shallow architectures. All numerical results are illustrated on synthetic lattice-protein data, that share similar statistical features with real protein sequences, and for which ground-truth interactions are known.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1.

5 papers.